The idea of student-centered learning
is not a recent idea. In fact, as early as the 20th century, educational
educators such as John Dewey argued for highly active and individualized
pedagogical methods which place the student at the center of the
teaching-learning process.
The Traditional Classroom
It may be observed that
classrooms are usually arranged with neat columns and rows of student chairs or
desks, while the teacher stands in front of the classroom or sits behind his
table. This situation is necessitated by the need to maintain classroom
discipline, also allows the teacher to control classroom activities through
lecture presentation and teacher-led discussions.
Noticeably, however, after
spending so many minutes in lesson presentation and class management, students
can get restless and fidgety. Often enough, the teacher has to also manage
misbehaviour in class as students start to talk among themselves or simply
stare away in lack of attention.
The SCL Classroom
John Dewey has described traditional
learning as a process in which the teacher pours information to student
learners, much like pouring water from a jug into cups. This is based on the
long accepted belief that the teacher must perform his role of teaching so that
learning can occur. This learning approach is generally known as direct
instruction, and it has worked well for obtaining many kinds of learning
outcomes. The problem with it is that the approach in learning, however, is the
fact that the world’s societies have began to change. It may not be felt
strongly to countries in which on countries who depends mostly their economy to
factory workers. Traditional and direct instruction is very useful in these
countries.
In contrast, industrialized societies
we find knowledge-based economies in which workers depend on information that
can be accessed through information and communication technologies (ICTs).
Desiring to gain effectiveness, efficiency and economy in administration,
schools in these developed economies have also adopted the support of ICTs.
Their students have now become active not passive learners, demonstrating
independence and self-awareness in the learning process.
REFLECTION
SCL environment is very useful
especially if a nation wants to progress and develop. There are some schools
here in the Philippines who already adopted the SCL environment in instruction.
Others object from it since they think that and SCL can be noisy and unwieldy.
As we all know, in the traditional
classroom, a teacher can discipline and manage his/her students. The teacher in
that has always the first and final say in the lesson. But the difference is
that in the traditional classroom, a student can sometimes feel intimidated and
bored since it is always the voice of the teacher who echoes most of the time
and leads the discussion. While in a SCL environment, it gives students the
venue to interact with each other, be motivated as everyone can participate and
enjoy. It can be as noisy as it is, but it gives the students independence and
self-awareness. It does not mean that in a SCL, the teacher can no longer do
classroom management. The teacher still is the one more knowledgeable than
his/her students, but he do not anymore act as the teacher who do talking most
of the times, but he/she is now a facilitator, open to ideas, problems and
resolutions from his/her students. I believe that SCL is fun, memorable and
healthy just like training or a workshop.
No comments:
Post a Comment